<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1535 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199912</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant, as the disputed services were considered to fall under the category of port services based on precedents. The rejection of the refund claim under Notification No. 41/2007-ST for service tax paid on specific services not classified as port services was overturned, emphasizing the importance of accurately categorizing services for refund purposes and maintaining consistency in interpreting similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1535 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199912</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant, as the disputed services were considered to fall under the category of port services based on precedents. The rejection of the refund claim under Notification No. 41/2007-ST for service tax paid on specific services not classified as port services was overturned, emphasizing the importance of accurately categorizing services for refund purposes and maintaining consistency in interpreting similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>