<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 678 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356975</link>
    <description>A seizure order under Section 129 of the U.P. GST Act, 2017 was challenged in writ proceedings on the ground that writ interference was warranted and that the petitioners need not first pursue the statutory release mechanism. The petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the proper officer under Section 129 for release of the goods, and the officer was directed to decide the matter expeditiously in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 16:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 678 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356975</link>
      <description>A seizure order under Section 129 of the U.P. GST Act, 2017 was challenged in writ proceedings on the ground that writ interference was warranted and that the petitioners need not first pursue the statutory release mechanism. The petition was disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the proper officer under Section 129 for release of the goods, and the officer was directed to decide the matter expeditiously in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>