<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 674 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356971</link>
    <description>The court granted an interim stay on the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2010-11. It found that the Assessing Officer lacked a reasonable belief that income had escaped assessment, as the reasons for reopening were based on information not properly examined. The court emphasized the necessity for Assessing Officers to independently assess material before issuing notices for reopening assessments, highlighting the importance of adherence to proper procedures in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 21:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 674 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356971</link>
      <description>The court granted an interim stay on the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2010-11. It found that the Assessing Officer lacked a reasonable belief that income had escaped assessment, as the reasons for reopening were based on information not properly examined. The court emphasized the necessity for Assessing Officers to independently assess material before issuing notices for reopening assessments, highlighting the importance of adherence to proper procedures in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>