<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 666 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356963</link>
    <description>The tribunal found the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act unsustainable due to the ambiguous notice issued by the assessing officer and the lack of clear findings on concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The penalty of Rs. 10,41,586/- was canceled, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed. The tribunal emphasized the importance of fair hearings and pronounced its decision on 12/03/2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 10:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 666 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356963</link>
      <description>The tribunal found the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act unsustainable due to the ambiguous notice issued by the assessing officer and the lack of clear findings on concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The penalty of Rs. 10,41,586/- was canceled, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed. The tribunal emphasized the importance of fair hearings and pronounced its decision on 12/03/2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>