<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 648 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356945</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the inclusion of transportation charges in the valuation but set aside the rejection of the declared value of the imported wines, ruling in favor of the Revenue&#039;s appeal on the grounds of discrepancies in pricing, nature of import, and authenticity concerns regarding the invoice and payment terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 10:01:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 648 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356945</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the inclusion of transportation charges in the valuation but set aside the rejection of the declared value of the imported wines, ruling in favor of the Revenue&#039;s appeal on the grounds of discrepancies in pricing, nature of import, and authenticity concerns regarding the invoice and payment terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>