<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 645 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356942</link>
    <description>The court decreed C.S.No.877 of 2005 as prayed for, without costs, due to non-compliance with Section 293(1)(a) of the Companies Act, rendering the Sale Agreement unenforceable. C.S.No.627 of 2008 was dismissed without costs, as the plaintiff lacked readiness for specific performance and failed to substantiate the claim for damages adequately. The plaintiff was entitled to withdraw the deposited amount of Rs. 2.50 Crores with accrued interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 10:01:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 645 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356942</link>
      <description>The court decreed C.S.No.877 of 2005 as prayed for, without costs, due to non-compliance with Section 293(1)(a) of the Companies Act, rendering the Sale Agreement unenforceable. C.S.No.627 of 2008 was dismissed without costs, as the plaintiff lacked readiness for specific performance and failed to substantiate the claim for damages adequately. The plaintiff was entitled to withdraw the deposited amount of Rs. 2.50 Crores with accrued interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>