https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356939 The court upheld the trial court's judgment, dismissing the appeal challenging the counter claim under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988. The appellants' claim to the suit property was considered a benami transaction, not meeting the exceptions outlined in the Act. The court emphasized the significance of the Act's provisions, particularly regarding transactions falling under specific sections exempt from being classified as benami. As the appellants failed to establish joint ownership or any interest through the presented power of attorneys, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the trial court's decision. en-us Tue, 13 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Dec 2019 18:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356939 The court upheld the trial court's judgment, dismissing the appeal challenging the counter claim under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988. The appellants' claim to the suit property was considered a benami transaction, not meeting the exceptions outlined in the Act. The court emphasized the significance of the Act's provisions, particularly regarding transactions falling under specific sections exempt from being classified as benami. As the appellants failed to establish joint ownership or any interest through the presented power of attorneys, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the trial court's decision. Case-Laws Benami Property Tue, 13 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356939