<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 627 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356924</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal and upheld that the bar of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act did not apply in this case. The decision favored the assessee, emphasizing the specific circumstances, discrepancies found, settlement by the Settlement Commission, and the interpretation of relevant sections of the Act. The court found no evidence supporting unjust enrichment in the case, leading to the judgment in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 627 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356924</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal and upheld that the bar of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act did not apply in this case. The decision favored the assessee, emphasizing the specific circumstances, discrepancies found, settlement by the Settlement Commission, and the interpretation of relevant sections of the Act. The court found no evidence supporting unjust enrichment in the case, leading to the judgment in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356924</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>