https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356923 The High Court held that the denial of CENVAT credit to the petitioner, based on default in payment of duty, was unjust and arbitrary after Rule 8(3A) was declared unconstitutional. The Court found the denial illegal and directed the respondent to adjust the claimed amount towards duty and interest, as the assessee had paid the duty and interest. The impugned order denying the credit was quashed, and the Court allowed the writ petition in favor of the petitioner. en-us Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Sep 2018 14:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356923 The High Court held that the denial of CENVAT credit to the petitioner, based on default in payment of duty, was unjust and arbitrary after Rule 8(3A) was declared unconstitutional. The Court found the denial illegal and directed the respondent to adjust the claimed amount towards duty and interest, as the assessee had paid the duty and interest. The impugned order denying the credit was quashed, and the Court allowed the writ petition in favor of the petitioner. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356923