<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 618 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356915</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, ruling in favor of the Appellant. It held that the valuation methodology used by the Appellant for central excise duty was compliant with the Valuation Rules. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the necessity of considering all relevant costs in determining the assessable value of goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2019 13:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 618 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356915</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, ruling in favor of the Appellant. It held that the valuation methodology used by the Appellant for central excise duty was compliant with the Valuation Rules. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the necessity of considering all relevant costs in determining the assessable value of goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>