<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 612 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356909</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods due to duty evasion but overturned duty demand confirmation and penalties. It emphasized the need for concrete evidence to establish duty evasion and highlighted that shortages alone are not conclusive proof of clandestine activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 09:54:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 612 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356909</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods due to duty evasion but overturned duty demand confirmation and penalties. It emphasized the need for concrete evidence to establish duty evasion and highlighted that shortages alone are not conclusive proof of clandestine activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>