<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 609 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356906</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the denial of Cenvat credit based on limited evidence from RTO and Octroi reports. Emphasizing the necessity of thorough investigations and supplier verifications, the decision highlighted the lack of concrete evidence supporting the credit denial for the entire period in question. The judgment underscores the importance of substantial evidence and comprehensive scrutiny in cases challenging credit availment, ensuring fair outcomes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 609 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356906</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the denial of Cenvat credit based on limited evidence from RTO and Octroi reports. Emphasizing the necessity of thorough investigations and supplier verifications, the decision highlighted the lack of concrete evidence supporting the credit denial for the entire period in question. The judgment underscores the importance of substantial evidence and comprehensive scrutiny in cases challenging credit availment, ensuring fair outcomes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>