<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 605 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356902</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeals challenging the refund granted to the respondent for services exported under Notification No.5/2006-CE(NT) r/w Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal upheld the classification of services as &quot;designing services&quot; eligible for tax exemption from June 1, 2007, despite Revenue&#039;s argument that the services did not qualify. The Tribunal confirmed the respondent&#039;s entitlement to the refund for taxable services exported and emphasized the need for document verification in sanctioning refunds. The Tribunal found in favor of the respondent, dismissing Revenue&#039;s appeals and allowing the change in the cause title for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 09:54:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 605 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356902</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeals challenging the refund granted to the respondent for services exported under Notification No.5/2006-CE(NT) r/w Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal upheld the classification of services as &quot;designing services&quot; eligible for tax exemption from June 1, 2007, despite Revenue&#039;s argument that the services did not qualify. The Tribunal confirmed the respondent&#039;s entitlement to the refund for taxable services exported and emphasized the need for document verification in sanctioning refunds. The Tribunal found in favor of the respondent, dismissing Revenue&#039;s appeals and allowing the change in the cause title for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>