https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199903 The Tribunal allowed the appeal based on consistency with a previous decision, confirming a demand under Club or Association Services for the period April 2005 to March 2008. Regarding the penalty enhancement from Rs. 100 to Rs. 200 per day, the Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need to resolve liability issues before determining penalties. The judgment underscores the importance of procedural fairness and consistency in decision-making based on precedent. en-us Fri, 22 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Apr 2018 14:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199903 The Tribunal allowed the appeal based on consistency with a previous decision, confirming a demand under Club or Association Services for the period April 2005 to March 2008. Regarding the penalty enhancement from Rs. 100 to Rs. 200 per day, the Tribunal remanded the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision, emphasizing the need to resolve liability issues before determining penalties. The judgment underscores the importance of procedural fairness and consistency in decision-making based on precedent. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 22 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199903