https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199909 The High Court of Bombay dismissed the Revenue's Appeal for noncompliance with procedural rules, citing negligence and lack of urgency in addressing deficiencies noted by the Registry. The court criticized the Revenue officials for blame-shifting, lack of awareness of orders, and failure to provide sufficient cause for significant delays. Emphasizing the importance of truthful and reasonable explanations for delays, the court condemned the casual and negligent attitude of the Revenue, stressing the need for accountability in legal proceedings. The court highlighted inconsistencies in the Revenue's actions and ordered the tagging and hearing of Appeals for prior and subsequent assessment years together for justice's sake. en-us Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Mar 2018 19:47:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199909 The High Court of Bombay dismissed the Revenue's Appeal for noncompliance with procedural rules, citing negligence and lack of urgency in addressing deficiencies noted by the Registry. The court criticized the Revenue officials for blame-shifting, lack of awareness of orders, and failure to provide sufficient cause for significant delays. Emphasizing the importance of truthful and reasonable explanations for delays, the court condemned the casual and negligent attitude of the Revenue, stressing the need for accountability in legal proceedings. The court highlighted inconsistencies in the Revenue's actions and ordered the tagging and hearing of Appeals for prior and subsequent assessment years together for justice's sake. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199909