<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 61 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12255</link>
    <description>Rasoi and hotel expenses incurred for customers were treated as ordinary business courtesies, not entertainment expenditure, where the facts showed provision of meals to outstation customers in the course of established business practice. On that basis, the expenses did not fall within the mischief of section 37(2B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and remained admissible business deductions. The reference was therefore answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 12:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 61 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12255</link>
      <description>Rasoi and hotel expenses incurred for customers were treated as ordinary business courtesies, not entertainment expenditure, where the facts showed provision of meals to outstation customers in the course of established business practice. On that basis, the expenses did not fall within the mischief of section 37(2B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and remained admissible business deductions. The reference was therefore answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>