https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199896 A wide security bond was construed to cover loss and deficiency in the Beawar treasury, so the treasurer remained liable notwithstanding the double-lock chest and the involvement or negligence of Government officials. The challenge to the longer limitation period for Government suits also failed because the distinction from private litigants was held to rest on a rational basis linked to public interest and the practical exigencies of governmental action. The appeal therefore failed, the respondent's decree was affirmed, and the claimed amount remained recoverable. en-us Mon, 24 Apr 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Mar 2018 17:50:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199896 A wide security bond was construed to cover loss and deficiency in the Beawar treasury, so the treasurer remained liable notwithstanding the double-lock chest and the involvement or negligence of Government officials. The challenge to the longer limitation period for Government suits also failed because the distinction from private litigants was held to rest on a rational basis linked to public interest and the practical exigencies of governmental action. The appeal therefore failed, the respondent's decree was affirmed, and the claimed amount remained recoverable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 24 Apr 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199896