<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (9) TMI 364 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199891</link>
    <description>Acquired land with demonstrable building-site potential may be valued on the basis of reliable comparable-sale evidence rather than its agricultural use, with appropriate deductions for development and amenities; on that approach, market value was enhanced and compensation increased. An indigent appellant who was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis and later succeeded only partly remains liable, under the amended pauper provisions, to pay the court fee that would have been payable but for pauper status; that liability is not confined to the extent of partial success, and the distinction between costs and court fee was maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 17:01:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (9) TMI 364 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199891</link>
      <description>Acquired land with demonstrable building-site potential may be valued on the basis of reliable comparable-sale evidence rather than its agricultural use, with appropriate deductions for development and amenities; on that approach, market value was enhanced and compensation increased. An indigent appellant who was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis and later succeeded only partly remains liable, under the amended pauper provisions, to pay the court fee that would have been payable but for pauper status; that liability is not confined to the extent of partial success, and the distinction between costs and court fee was maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>