https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199889 The Supreme Court held that the High Court's summary dismissal of a petition challenging the Commissioner's jurisdiction in a debt determination case constituted a final order in a civil proceeding. The High Court's refusal to grant a certificate for appeal under Article 133(1)(a) and (b) was erroneous as the dispute exceeded Rs. 20,000. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order, remanding the case for further proceedings, with costs to be borne by the first respondent. en-us Thu, 06 Jan 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:46:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199889 The Supreme Court held that the High Court's summary dismissal of a petition challenging the Commissioner's jurisdiction in a debt determination case constituted a final order in a civil proceeding. The High Court's refusal to grant a certificate for appeal under Article 133(1)(a) and (b) was erroneous as the dispute exceeded Rs. 20,000. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order, remanding the case for further proceedings, with costs to be borne by the first respondent. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 06 Jan 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199889