https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199886 Employees in a statutory canteen were treated as holding civil posts and their service conditions were governed by statutory instructions, so the Industrial Disputes Act was not attracted. On that footing, a reference under Section 10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 could not confer jurisdiction on the Industrial Tribunal to adjudicate the dismissal dispute. The proper remedy lay in constitutional or administrative proceedings rather than the industrial-dispute framework, and the Tribunal's view on lack of jurisdiction was upheld. en-us Wed, 09 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Mar 2018 16:09:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199886 Employees in a statutory canteen were treated as holding civil posts and their service conditions were governed by statutory instructions, so the Industrial Disputes Act was not attracted. On that footing, a reference under Section 10(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 could not confer jurisdiction on the Industrial Tribunal to adjudicate the dismissal dispute. The proper remedy lay in constitutional or administrative proceedings rather than the industrial-dispute framework, and the Tribunal's view on lack of jurisdiction was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 Jul 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199886