https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199883 The appeal was dismissed as the plaintiff was not entitled to relief under Section 65 of the Indian Contract Act, and the lease was found to be void under the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1948, and the Mineral Concession Rules, 1949. Sections 70 and 72 of the Indian Contract Act were also deemed inapplicable. The appeal was dismissed without costs. en-us Mon, 12 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:57:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199883 The appeal was dismissed as the plaintiff was not entitled to relief under Section 65 of the Indian Contract Act, and the lease was found to be void under the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1948, and the Mineral Concession Rules, 1949. Sections 70 and 72 of the Indian Contract Act were also deemed inapplicable. The appeal was dismissed without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199883