https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199880 Territorial jurisdiction in a copyright and passing-off suit is supported where the plaintiff carries on business from the relevant place, and a Delhi office brought the matter within jurisdiction; the undervaluation objection also failed because the aggregate value of the reliefs exceeded the amount pleaded by the defendant. Interim injunction principles were applied on the basis of substantial similarity in cartons, get-up, colour scheme and layout, creating a likelihood of deception. Copyright registration was treated as evidentiary, while originality, prior authorship and prior use were central to relief. Delay did not bar interim protection because the suit was filed within a reasonable time, no serious prejudice was shown, and balance of convenience and irreparable injury favoured the plaintiffs. en-us Fri, 23 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:43:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199880 Territorial jurisdiction in a copyright and passing-off suit is supported where the plaintiff carries on business from the relevant place, and a Delhi office brought the matter within jurisdiction; the undervaluation objection also failed because the aggregate value of the reliefs exceeded the amount pleaded by the defendant. Interim injunction principles were applied on the basis of substantial similarity in cartons, get-up, colour scheme and layout, creating a likelihood of deception. Copyright registration was treated as evidentiary, while originality, prior authorship and prior use were central to relief. Delay did not bar interim protection because the suit was filed within a reasonable time, no serious prejudice was shown, and balance of convenience and irreparable injury favoured the plaintiffs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199880