https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199877 Territorial jurisdiction in trade mark infringement and passing off depends on a real, commercially meaningful cause of action within the forum; stray or nominal transactions are insufficient. On the pleadings and evidence, the Bombay court found no adequate basis to entertain those claims. For the copyright claim, section 62 of the Copyright Act allowed jurisdiction because the plaintiffs carried on business in Bombay, but the composite suit could not proceed on that cause of action in isolation without leave under Clause 14 of the Letters Patent. The motion was dismissed, leaving the plaintiffs to seek relief only after the leave application, if maintainable. en-us Mon, 09 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:28:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199877 Territorial jurisdiction in trade mark infringement and passing off depends on a real, commercially meaningful cause of action within the forum; stray or nominal transactions are insufficient. On the pleadings and evidence, the Bombay court found no adequate basis to entertain those claims. For the copyright claim, section 62 of the Copyright Act allowed jurisdiction because the plaintiffs carried on business in Bombay, but the composite suit could not proceed on that cause of action in isolation without leave under Clause 14 of the Letters Patent. The motion was dismissed, leaving the plaintiffs to seek relief only after the leave application, if maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 09 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199877