https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199876 An arbitral award was sustained against challenges based on alleged error apparent on the face of the award, want of jurisdiction over company assets and shareholding disputes, absence of landlord consent for division of tenancy rights, breach of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956, and alleged natural justice violations arising from the annexed plan and conduct of the proceedings. The court treated the company's participation and the parties' intended business division as sufficient to support the award, accepted the evidence of landlord consent, and held that the premises plan reflected a hearing-based partition exercise rather than arbitral misconduct. The limitation objection was noted but did not determine the result. en-us Fri, 19 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Mar 2018 15:10:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199876 An arbitral award was sustained against challenges based on alleged error apparent on the face of the award, want of jurisdiction over company assets and shareholding disputes, absence of landlord consent for division of tenancy rights, breach of the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956, and alleged natural justice violations arising from the annexed plan and conduct of the proceedings. The court treated the company's participation and the parties' intended business division as sufficient to support the award, accepted the evidence of landlord consent, and held that the premises plan reflected a hearing-based partition exercise rather than arbitral misconduct. The limitation objection was noted but did not determine the result. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Jan 1979 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199876