https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199870 An amendment to a plaint that adds further grounds supporting the same grievance already disclosed in the statutory notice does not create a fresh cause of action or offend Section 80 CPC. A compromise dealing only with compensation does not waive the right to challenge requisition or acquisition orders, and a challenge to an order said to be without jurisdiction is not governed in the same way as one to a valid subsisting order for limitation purposes. An order made for an extraneous purpose or without the empowered authority's independent judgment is void for want of jurisdiction. Public-interest privilege may justify refusal of discovery only when properly claimed; limited disclosure was directed for non-privileged material. en-us Mon, 18 Sep 1950 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:23:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199870 An amendment to a plaint that adds further grounds supporting the same grievance already disclosed in the statutory notice does not create a fresh cause of action or offend Section 80 CPC. A compromise dealing only with compensation does not waive the right to challenge requisition or acquisition orders, and a challenge to an order said to be without jurisdiction is not governed in the same way as one to a valid subsisting order for limitation purposes. An order made for an extraneous purpose or without the empowered authority's independent judgment is void for want of jurisdiction. Public-interest privilege may justify refusal of discovery only when properly claimed; limited disclosure was directed for non-privileged material. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 18 Sep 1950 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199870