https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199868 A prosecution under the Drugs Act was valid where the complaint was filed by the Inspector required by the statute, so the objection to jurisdiction failed. The existing Bombay Drugs Rules, 1946 continued in force under the General Clauses Act after amendment of the parent provision, so the absence of fresh Central rules did not defeat the licensing regime or the conviction for manufacturing without a licence. On the evidence, the preparations contained allopathic medicines and fell within the Act's inclusive definition of "drugs," and the charge was sufficiently clear. The conviction under the Act was therefore sustained. en-us Fri, 12 Dec 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:17:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199868 A prosecution under the Drugs Act was valid where the complaint was filed by the Inspector required by the statute, so the objection to jurisdiction failed. The existing Bombay Drugs Rules, 1946 continued in force under the General Clauses Act after amendment of the parent provision, so the absence of fresh Central rules did not defeat the licensing regime or the conviction for manufacturing without a licence. On the evidence, the preparations contained allopathic medicines and fell within the Act's inclusive definition of "drugs," and the charge was sufficiently clear. The conviction under the Act was therefore sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 12 Dec 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199868