<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (7) TMI 269 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199863</link>
    <description>An FIR alleging forgery, cheating and conspiracy was held to disclose cognizable offences, so the investigation could not be quashed on a bare plea of mala fides; alleged falsity of the accusations was treated as a matter for investigation, not writ review. The administrative suspension of compensation bonds was sustained because, although Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure did not confer jurisdiction on the authority, it could exercise limited inherent power to correct apparent mistakes or address suspected fraud and temporarily suspend further encashment pending inquiry. The suspension was interim, so no prior hearing was required at that stage, but a reasonable hearing was directed before any final decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (7) TMI 269 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199863</link>
      <description>An FIR alleging forgery, cheating and conspiracy was held to disclose cognizable offences, so the investigation could not be quashed on a bare plea of mala fides; alleged falsity of the accusations was treated as a matter for investigation, not writ review. The administrative suspension of compensation bonds was sustained because, although Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure did not confer jurisdiction on the authority, it could exercise limited inherent power to correct apparent mistakes or address suspected fraud and temporarily suspend further encashment pending inquiry. The suspension was interim, so no prior hearing was required at that stage, but a reasonable hearing was directed before any final decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>