https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199855 The Supreme Court held that Art. 311 of the Constitution does not apply to suspension of temporary employees and that the refusal to pay subsistence allowance during suspension does not indicate termination as punishment. The Court also ruled that specific allegations and evidence of discrimination must be provided to establish a violation of Arts. 14 and 16 of the Constitution in employment termination cases. As the respondent failed to prove discrimination, the appeal was allowed, setting aside the High Court's decision and restoring the trial Court's decree, with no order as to costs. en-us Fri, 28 Apr 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:58:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199855 The Supreme Court held that Art. 311 of the Constitution does not apply to suspension of temporary employees and that the refusal to pay subsistence allowance during suspension does not indicate termination as punishment. The Court also ruled that specific allegations and evidence of discrimination must be provided to establish a violation of Arts. 14 and 16 of the Constitution in employment termination cases. As the respondent failed to prove discrimination, the appeal was allowed, setting aside the High Court's decision and restoring the trial Court's decree, with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 Apr 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199855