https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199851 A plea of fraud must be supported by specific pleadings of material particulars; general allegations are insufficient, and evidence cannot travel beyond the pleaded case. On the facts stated, the fraud plea failed for want of particulars and could not defeat the claim. A finding that the purchaser was a bona fide transferee for value without notice could not survive because it rested on the rejected assumption of fraud and on evidence assessed on that erroneous basis. The purchaser was not proved to be without notice of the prior agreement, and the first appellate court's dismissal of the suit was set aside, with the plaintiffs' decree restored with costs. en-us Thu, 19 Nov 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Mar 2018 12:26:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199851 A plea of fraud must be supported by specific pleadings of material particulars; general allegations are insufficient, and evidence cannot travel beyond the pleaded case. On the facts stated, the fraud plea failed for want of particulars and could not defeat the claim. A finding that the purchaser was a bona fide transferee for value without notice could not survive because it rested on the rejected assumption of fraud and on evidence assessed on that erroneous basis. The purchaser was not proved to be without notice of the prior agreement, and the first appellate court's dismissal of the suit was set aside, with the plaintiffs' decree restored with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 19 Nov 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199851