<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (10) TMI 184 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199843</link>
    <description>Order 39 Rule 2-A CPC applies only to disobedience of a subsisting temporary injunction; once the injunction is vacated, there is no operative order left to obey or enforce. The provision is designed to secure compliance with interim injunctions and punish breach through attachment or civil detention, but those consequences do not survive the cessation of the injunction. Accordingly, action under Rule 2-A cannot be sustained for alleged breach after the interim injunction has been vacated, and the adverse finding was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:09:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (10) TMI 184 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199843</link>
      <description>Order 39 Rule 2-A CPC applies only to disobedience of a subsisting temporary injunction; once the injunction is vacated, there is no operative order left to obey or enforce. The provision is designed to secure compliance with interim injunctions and punish breach through attachment or civil detention, but those consequences do not survive the cessation of the injunction. Accordingly, action under Rule 2-A cannot be sustained for alleged breach after the interim injunction has been vacated, and the adverse finding was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>