https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199839 Emergency appointment power exercised by a Vice-Chancellor was only tentative and not final unless confirmed by the competent Executive Committee, because the statutory scheme preserved the ordinary appointing authority's role. Allegations of fraud or collusion in selection records required specific particulars and were not established by general assertions alone. Injunctive relief to restrain a university from acting on the appointment was therefore inappropriate where no strong prima facie case was shown, and the restraint could not be continued. en-us Fri, 26 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Mar 2018 10:50:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199839 Emergency appointment power exercised by a Vice-Chancellor was only tentative and not final unless confirmed by the competent Executive Committee, because the statutory scheme preserved the ordinary appointing authority's role. Allegations of fraud or collusion in selection records required specific particulars and were not established by general assertions alone. Injunctive relief to restrain a university from acting on the appointment was therefore inappropriate where no strong prima facie case was shown, and the restraint could not be continued. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199839