<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 591 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356888</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Tribunal&#039;s order on the disallowance of investment in tax-free securities under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, citing a previous judgment against the Revenue. Additionally, the Court found that the remand of the issue of disallowance back to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication did not raise substantial questions of law and was procedural in nature. The Court concluded that the issue of disallowance made to Book Profit was consequential and did not present a substantial question of law, thus dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 06:52:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 591 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356888</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Tribunal&#039;s order on the disallowance of investment in tax-free securities under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, citing a previous judgment against the Revenue. Additionally, the Court found that the remand of the issue of disallowance back to the Assessing Officer for re-adjudication did not raise substantial questions of law and was procedural in nature. The Court concluded that the issue of disallowance made to Book Profit was consequential and did not present a substantial question of law, thus dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>