https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356871 The court found the writ petition premature as the petitioner's discharge application was pending before the Trial Court. The rejection of the application for registration as an Insolvency Professional was based on the petitioner not being deemed a fit and proper person. The court granted the petitioner liberty to reapproach once the discharge application was decided, emphasizing the need for expedited adjudication. If the Trial Court granted discharge, a fresh application could be considered, ensuring the respondent could reassess the case based on new circumstances. The writ petition was disposed of along with pending applications. en-us Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Mar 2018 06:51:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356871 The court found the writ petition premature as the petitioner's discharge application was pending before the Trial Court. The rejection of the application for registration as an Insolvency Professional was based on the petitioner not being deemed a fit and proper person. The court granted the petitioner liberty to reapproach once the discharge application was decided, emphasizing the need for expedited adjudication. If the Trial Court granted discharge, a fresh application could be considered, ensuring the respondent could reassess the case based on new circumstances. The writ petition was disposed of along with pending applications. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356871