<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 570 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356867</link>
    <description>The court directed the concerned authority to consider the application for amendment to the Import General Manifest, with the petitioner executing an indemnity bond. The court clarified its order did not express an opinion on rival contentions and allowed respondent nos. 4 and 5 to pursue legal remedies. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions, ensuring protection of all parties&#039; interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 06:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512517" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 570 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356867</link>
      <description>The court directed the concerned authority to consider the application for amendment to the Import General Manifest, with the petitioner executing an indemnity bond. The court clarified its order did not express an opinion on rival contentions and allowed respondent nos. 4 and 5 to pursue legal remedies. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions, ensuring protection of all parties&#039; interests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>