<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 568 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356865</link>
    <description>Reliable foreign customs documents, corroborated by matching invoices, bills of export, bills of lading and the supplier&#039;s statement, were sufficient to displace the declared import transaction value and support enhancement of assessable value; the differential duty and related penalty were upheld. Redemption fine could not be sustained because the goods were neither available for confiscation nor provisionally released; it was set aside. A separate personal penalty on the proprietor was also unwarranted where penalty had already been imposed on the proprietary concern for the same demand; that additional penalty was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2019 18:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 568 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356865</link>
      <description>Reliable foreign customs documents, corroborated by matching invoices, bills of export, bills of lading and the supplier&#039;s statement, were sufficient to displace the declared import transaction value and support enhancement of assessable value; the differential duty and related penalty were upheld. Redemption fine could not be sustained because the goods were neither available for confiscation nor provisionally released; it was set aside. A separate personal penalty on the proprietor was also unwarranted where penalty had already been imposed on the proprietary concern for the same demand; that additional penalty was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>