<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 564 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356861</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal and granting the appellant a refund of import duty under Section 26A of the Customs Act, 1962. The decision emphasized the significance of proving discrepancies and defects in imported goods to qualify for refunds as per the applicable legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 12:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 564 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356861</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal and granting the appellant a refund of import duty under Section 26A of the Customs Act, 1962. The decision emphasized the significance of proving discrepancies and defects in imported goods to qualify for refunds as per the applicable legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>