<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 561 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356858</link>
    <description>The court held that the Option Agreement was valid and enforceable as a guarantee, rejecting the appellant&#039;s claim of termination. The court determined that the appellant&#039;s attempt to unilaterally terminate the agreement was ineffective due to specific termination conditions not being met. Additionally, the court found the winding-up proceedings appropriate based on the agreement, dismissing the appeal and setting the petition for final hearing while rejecting the appellant&#039;s request for a stay on the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2018 21:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 561 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356858</link>
      <description>The court held that the Option Agreement was valid and enforceable as a guarantee, rejecting the appellant&#039;s claim of termination. The court determined that the appellant&#039;s attempt to unilaterally terminate the agreement was ineffective due to specific termination conditions not being met. Additionally, the court found the winding-up proceedings appropriate based on the agreement, dismissing the appeal and setting the petition for final hearing while rejecting the appellant&#039;s request for a stay on the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>