<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 560 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356857</link>
    <description>The court directed the petitioners, who challenged a list of disqualified directors, to file necessary documents for voluntary striking off and apply under the Condonation of Delay Scheme -2018. Compliance with Section 248(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 would grant benefits under CODS-2018, leading to the company&#039;s removal. The impugned list of disqualified directors was stayed pending further decision. Failure to comply or provide accurate information could result in contempt proceedings. The petition and pending applications were disposed of, emphasizing compliance with dissolution requirements and CODS-2018 to avoid contempt of court prosecution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 11:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 560 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356857</link>
      <description>The court directed the petitioners, who challenged a list of disqualified directors, to file necessary documents for voluntary striking off and apply under the Condonation of Delay Scheme -2018. Compliance with Section 248(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 would grant benefits under CODS-2018, leading to the company&#039;s removal. The impugned list of disqualified directors was stayed pending further decision. Failure to comply or provide accurate information could result in contempt proceedings. The petition and pending applications were disposed of, emphasizing compliance with dissolution requirements and CODS-2018 to avoid contempt of court prosecution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>