https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356851 The Tribunal determined that the contracts in question were composite works contracts and not simple service contracts for taxation purposes. They noted that the contracts involved various elements such as design, supply, erection, testing, commissioning, and maintenance work, constituting a typical works contract service. As a result, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and disposed of the respondent's cross-objection accordingly. en-us Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Mar 2018 06:49:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356851 The Tribunal determined that the contracts in question were composite works contracts and not simple service contracts for taxation purposes. They noted that the contracts involved various elements such as design, supply, erection, testing, commissioning, and maintenance work, constituting a typical works contract service. As a result, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and disposed of the respondent's cross-objection accordingly. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356851