<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 549 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356846</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court condoned the delay and allowed exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order. The court issued notice for further consideration based on the facts presented in the order of the Commissioner(Appeals). The Revenue&#039;s counsel referred to a previous decision in Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur-I vs. Indorama Synthetics (India) Ltd. for support.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 17:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 549 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356846</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court condoned the delay and allowed exemption from filing certified copy of the impugned order. The court issued notice for further consideration based on the facts presented in the order of the Commissioner(Appeals). The Revenue&#039;s counsel referred to a previous decision in Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur-I vs. Indorama Synthetics (India) Ltd. for support.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>