<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 544 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356841</link>
    <description>Cocoon purchased from the Government&#039;s Resham Directorate was held liable to purchase tax under Section 3-AAAA for the period governed by the 14.11.1995 notification, because the exemption for silk yarn did not extend to cocoon, which is a distinct commercial article and was not resold in the same form and condition. The assessee also failed to show that the supplier was a registered dealer or that cocoon was otherwise exempt. For the later period under the 26.02.2000 notification, the Tribunal had not examined whether cocoon fell within the expression &quot;pure silk&quot;; that limited issue required fresh consideration, and the matters were remanded for decision on that exemption question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2018 12:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 544 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356841</link>
      <description>Cocoon purchased from the Government&#039;s Resham Directorate was held liable to purchase tax under Section 3-AAAA for the period governed by the 14.11.1995 notification, because the exemption for silk yarn did not extend to cocoon, which is a distinct commercial article and was not resold in the same form and condition. The assessee also failed to show that the supplier was a registered dealer or that cocoon was otherwise exempt. For the later period under the 26.02.2000 notification, the Tribunal had not examined whether cocoon fell within the expression &quot;pure silk&quot;; that limited issue required fresh consideration, and the matters were remanded for decision on that exemption question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>