<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 1141 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199826</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition of wealth amounting to 2,06,31,230. The Tribunal found that the cash seized during a search operation, totaling 12,69,85,000, was not to be considered as cash in hand for calculating net wealth as it was deposited in a PD account to adjust against tax liability. The Tribunal relied on a previous case where seized cash was similarly treated. As a result, the appeal by the assessee was allowed, overturning the decision of the Ld. CWT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2018 21:12:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 1141 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199826</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition of wealth amounting to 2,06,31,230. The Tribunal found that the cash seized during a search operation, totaling 12,69,85,000, was not to be considered as cash in hand for calculating net wealth as it was deposited in a PD account to adjust against tax liability. The Tribunal relied on a previous case where seized cash was similarly treated. As a result, the appeal by the assessee was allowed, overturning the decision of the Ld. CWT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>