https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199833 The SC allowed the appeals, overturning the Division Bench's judgment, and upheld the decision of the Single Judge. It concluded that there was no illegality in the Appellant-Institute's decision to appoint Respondent Nos. 2 to 6 as Associate Professors. The Court found no substantial discrepancy between the recruitment advertisement and the prescribed rules. It emphasized that the Respondent No. 1-writ Petitioner, having participated in the selection process without objection, was not entitled to challenge it after being unsuccessful. The integrity of the Selection Committee was not questioned, and the selected candidates met the required qualifications and experience. en-us Thu, 20 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Feb 2024 15:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199833 The SC allowed the appeals, overturning the Division Bench's judgment, and upheld the decision of the Single Judge. It concluded that there was no illegality in the Appellant-Institute's decision to appoint Respondent Nos. 2 to 6 as Associate Professors. The Court found no substantial discrepancy between the recruitment advertisement and the prescribed rules. It emphasized that the Respondent No. 1-writ Petitioner, having participated in the selection process without objection, was not entitled to challenge it after being unsuccessful. The integrity of the Selection Committee was not questioned, and the selected candidates met the required qualifications and experience. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 20 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199833