<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1937 (3) TMI 17 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199823</link>
    <description>Municipal resolutions passed without valid statutory delegation are ultra vires and unenforceable, so they may be restrained by injunction. The document also notes that repeal of an earlier prohibition on bathing did not revive any extinguished public right, because repeal alone cannot restore the prior right under the general clauses rule. Although the bye-law regulating bathing in public tanks was treated as beyond the enabling power and therefore ineffective, injunctive relief still required a subsisting personal legal right. On the facts, the association could not rely on a revived general right to bathe or swim, so relief was limited to restraint against the unauthorized resolutions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 1937 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:00:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=512466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1937 (3) TMI 17 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199823</link>
      <description>Municipal resolutions passed without valid statutory delegation are ultra vires and unenforceable, so they may be restrained by injunction. The document also notes that repeal of an earlier prohibition on bathing did not revive any extinguished public right, because repeal alone cannot restore the prior right under the general clauses rule. Although the bye-law regulating bathing in public tanks was treated as beyond the enabling power and therefore ineffective, injunctive relief still required a subsisting personal legal right. On the facts, the association could not rely on a revived general right to bathe or swim, so relief was limited to restraint against the unauthorized resolutions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 1937 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>