https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199816 The Court dismissed the petition, stating that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the case due to challenges in conducting an inquiry into alleged torture of detenus in jail. The Court highlighted the availability of the Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur as a more suitable forum to address the grievances raised by the petitioners, emphasizing that the exercise of powers under Article 226 remained discretionary. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition in limine, advising the petitioners to seek remedies in the Rajasthan High Court, which had the jurisdiction and means to comprehensively address the issues raised. en-us Tue, 12 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Mar 2018 16:14:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199816 The Court dismissed the petition, stating that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the case due to challenges in conducting an inquiry into alleged torture of detenus in jail. The Court highlighted the availability of the Rajasthan High Court at Jodhpur as a more suitable forum to address the grievances raised by the petitioners, emphasizing that the exercise of powers under Article 226 remained discretionary. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition in limine, advising the petitioners to seek remedies in the Rajasthan High Court, which had the jurisdiction and means to comprehensively address the issues raised. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199816