<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 82 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12232</link>
    <description>A hospital or nursing home building is not automatically &quot;plant&quot; for depreciation purposes; the test depends on functional necessity and the actual use of each portion in the business. Specialised areas such as an operation theatre or x-ray facility may qualify as plant if their operational requirements, including sterilisation or insulation, make them integral to the business, but the assessee must prove the specific extent so qualifying. A blanket claim for plant-rate depreciation on the entire building was held unsustainable because the factual inquiry had not been undertaken. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, with depreciation at the plant rate limited to the proven qualifying portion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 82 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12232</link>
      <description>A hospital or nursing home building is not automatically &quot;plant&quot; for depreciation purposes; the test depends on functional necessity and the actual use of each portion in the business. Specialised areas such as an operation theatre or x-ray facility may qualify as plant if their operational requirements, including sterilisation or insulation, make them integral to the business, but the assessee must prove the specific extent so qualifying. A blanket claim for plant-rate depreciation on the entire building was held unsustainable because the factual inquiry had not been undertaken. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, with depreciation at the plant rate limited to the proven qualifying portion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>