https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199810 A wrongful dismissal in breach of Article 311(2) was treated as an actionable wrong for purposes of apportionment under Section 88 of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956, and liability could pass to the successor State where the entire cause of action arose within its territory. Where a material part of the cause of action arose outside that territory, clause (b) of Section 88 did not apply. Section 116 was confined to persons actually holding or discharging the duties of a post immediately before the appointed day, so it did not preserve service status after dismissal orders had been made, even if those orders were later argued to be invalid. en-us Wed, 19 Nov 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:56:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199810 A wrongful dismissal in breach of Article 311(2) was treated as an actionable wrong for purposes of apportionment under Section 88 of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956, and liability could pass to the successor State where the entire cause of action arose within its territory. Where a material part of the cause of action arose outside that territory, clause (b) of Section 88 did not apply. Section 116 was confined to persons actually holding or discharging the duties of a post immediately before the appointed day, so it did not preserve service status after dismissal orders had been made, even if those orders were later argued to be invalid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Nov 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199810