https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199809 The High Court remitted the case back to the Company Law Board for consideration on the merits and directed it to consider the application for interim relief. Despite no specific provisions for interim relief in Sections 248 or 250(1), the Board granted limited relief, restraining the transfer of shares in the promoters' quota until the petition's disposal. The respondents were given deadlines for filing replies and the petition was scheduled for a hearing in September 1998. en-us Thu, 04 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:40:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199809 The High Court remitted the case back to the Company Law Board for consideration on the merits and directed it to consider the application for interim relief. Despite no specific provisions for interim relief in Sections 248 or 250(1), the Board granted limited relief, restraining the transfer of shares in the promoters' quota until the petition's disposal. The respondents were given deadlines for filing replies and the petition was scheduled for a hearing in September 1998. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 04 Jun 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199809