https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199806 A broadly worded arbitration clause covering disputes arising out of or relating to the contract was held to extend to a claim based on an alleged subsequent arrangement, because the pleaded novation did not clearly supersede the original contract and the broker's impleadment did not alter the contractual framework. The Court also held that a defamation claim framed in tort remained arbitrable where the alleged defamatory correspondence arose in the course of efforts to enforce payment under the contract and could not be determined without reference to the contractual terms and dealings. The stay order was therefore not interfered with. en-us Tue, 19 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:34:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199806 A broadly worded arbitration clause covering disputes arising out of or relating to the contract was held to extend to a claim based on an alleged subsequent arrangement, because the pleaded novation did not clearly supersede the original contract and the broker's impleadment did not alter the contractual framework. The Court also held that a defamation claim framed in tort remained arbitrable where the alleged defamatory correspondence arose in the course of efforts to enforce payment under the contract and could not be determined without reference to the contractual terms and dealings. The stay order was therefore not interfered with. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 19 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199806