https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199803 A later arrangement did not abrogate the original arbitration clause, because implied rescission was not established and the alleged oral rescission was not proved. The court also held that an arbitration agreement is not necessarily required to be in writing for every purpose, so the Evidence Act objection did not succeed. Disputes over balance goods, substituted arrangements and damages were treated as arising out of the contract and therefore within the arbitration clause, making them stayable under the Arbitration Act. The discretion to stay the suit was properly exercised because no sufficient reason was shown to depart from the parties' agreement to arbitrate. en-us Thu, 15 Jan 1959 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:17:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199803 A later arrangement did not abrogate the original arbitration clause, because implied rescission was not established and the alleged oral rescission was not proved. The court also held that an arbitration agreement is not necessarily required to be in writing for every purpose, so the Evidence Act objection did not succeed. Disputes over balance goods, substituted arrangements and damages were treated as arising out of the contract and therefore within the arbitration clause, making them stayable under the Arbitration Act. The discretion to stay the suit was properly exercised because no sufficient reason was shown to depart from the parties' agreement to arbitrate. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 15 Jan 1959 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199803